This is an attempt to rank the 120 D1 teams based on their performance in different statistical categories.
The method I used was fairly straight-forward. Each team receives a score from 0-1 in each stat category. The score is calculated by (Value - Min / Max). Okay, maybe that's not particular straight forward, but here's an example:
In the category TD/game, the best team (Oregon) averaged 6.23 TD/game. In this category, Max=6.23. The worst was Memphis at 1.58 TD/game. In this category, Min=1.58. That means the span of values is 6.23-1.58, or 4.65. I subtract the category Min from each team's score to move the span to a start point of zero. This becomes each team's adjusted category value.
Then, to compute each team's points for that category I take the adjusted team value and divide it by the total span of that category. So, the computation for Oregon is (6.23-1.58)/4.65, or 4.65/4.65. This ensures that the #1 team in each category receives exactly 1 point. Memphis' computation is (1.58-1.58)/4.65, or 0/4.65. This sets the last place team in each category to 0 points. Each of the 118 other team's scores is calculated as a proportion of their values compared to the best in the category. While this looks much like a simple 1-120 ranking, it is slightly different, and allows for one team with an unusually high or low score to be rewarded or punished accordingly in a way that a simple 1-n ranking does not allow.
I perform those calculation on 73 categories and then sum the scores. The team with the highest total score is ranked #1 in my system.
Pros:
Completely objective - it is based solely on the team's performance with no consideration given to strength of schedule
Cons:
Does not consider W/L Record
Weights all statistical categories equally - scoring defense is the same weight as 3rd down conversions / game
Looking back at 2010, my top 25 is:
0 | Team | Conference | Adjusted Total Score |
---|---|---|---|
1 | TCU | Mountain West | 50.79 |
2 | Wisconsin | Big Ten | 50.33 |
3 | Boise State | WAC | 49.37 |
4 | Ohio State | Big Ten | 49.04 |
5 | Stanford | Pac 10 | 46.99 |
6 | Alabama | SEC | 46.39 |
7 | Northern Illinois | MAC | 44.31 |
8 | Oklahoma | Big 12 | 43.67 |
9 | Virginia Tech | ACC | 43.57 |
10 | Iowa | Big Ten | 43.21 |
11 | Nevada | WAC | 42.95 |
12 | Hawai'i | WAC | 42.90 |
13 | UCF | USA | 42.69 |
14 | Georgia | SEC | 42.38 |
15 | Auburn | SEC | 42.27 |
16 | Oklahoma State | Big 12 | 42.22 |
17 | Oregon | Pac 10 | 41.77 |
18 | Air Force | Mountain West | 41.65 |
19 | San Diego State | Mountain West | 41.57 |
20 | North Carolina State | ACC | 41.56 |
21 | Navy | Independent | 41.55 |
22 | Arkansas | SEC | 41.00 |
23 | Illinois | Big Ten | 40.74 |
24 | West Virginia | Big East | 40.69 |
25 | Missouri | Big 12 | 40.55 |
In care you're wondering, Nebraska ranked #47, with 38.26 points.
We were decidedly ordinary last year.
No comments:
Post a Comment